{"id":2825,"date":"2026-10-30T16:52:02","date_gmt":"2026-10-30T16:52:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-sets-final-13-65-anti-dumping-rate-on-brazilian-aluminum-foil\/"},"modified":"2026-10-30T16:52:04","modified_gmt":"2026-10-30T16:52:04","slug":"us-sets-final-13-65-anti-dumping-rate-on-brazilian-aluminum-foil","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-sets-final-13-65-anti-dumping-rate-on-brazilian-aluminum-foil\/","title":{"rendered":"US Sets Final 13.65% Anti-Dumping Rate on Brazilian Aluminum Foil"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph hsn-lede\">United States sets a final 13.65% anti-dumping deposit on aluminum foil from Brazilian maker CBA, starting Oct. 30, 2026.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. Department of Commerce set a final 13.65% anti-dumping rate on aluminum foil from Brazilian maker CBA, applying from Oct. 30, 2026.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rate comes from the final results of a yearly review, published in the Federal Register on Oct. 30, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\" id=\"hsn-cite-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The review covered sales made between Nov. 1, 2023, and Oct. 31, 2024<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, a U.S. importer of CBA&#8217;s foil now pays a cash deposit of 13.65% of the shipment&#8217;s value at entry. That is lower than the 16.61% Commerce proposed in May<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\" id=\"hsn-cite-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. It is also lower than the 18.74% set in the previous review<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\" id=\"hsn-cite-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What did Commerce decide on Brazilian aluminum foil?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce found that Companhia Brasileira de Alum\u00ednio and CBA Itapissuma Ltda., together called CBA, sold aluminum foil in the United States below normal value<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Normal value is, in simple terms, the fair price Commerce calculates for the goods. Selling below it is called dumping.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An anti-dumping duty is an extra import tax that makes up the gap between the export price and that fair price. Commerce set CBA&#8217;s final <strong>dumping margin at 13.65%<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. This margin is a weighted average, so it reflects all of CBA&#8217;s examined sales in the period.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice was signed on Oct. 27, 2026, by Commerce&#8217;s acting deputy assistant secretary for anti-dumping and countervailing duty operations<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. It took effect on the day it was published, <strong>Oct. 30, 2026<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which aluminum foil does the duty cover?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The duty applies under an anti-dumping order on aluminum foil from Armenia, Brazil, Oman, Russia and Turkey. Commerce published that order on Nov. 12, 2021<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Only the Brazilian part of the order is reviewed in this notice.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v4\" data-at=\"which-aluminum-foil-does-the-duty-cover\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__table\">\n    <h4>What the aluminum foil order covers<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n      <thead>\n        <tr><th>Point<\/th><th>Rule<\/th><\/tr>\n      <\/thead>\n      <tbody>\n        <tr><th>Thickness<\/th><td>0.2 mm or less<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Reel size<\/th><td>Reels over 25 pounds, any width<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Alloy<\/th><td>More than 92% aluminum<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Still covered<\/th><td>Foil with lubricant on one or both sides<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Excluded<\/th><td>Backed foil, etched capacitor foil, foil cut to shape<\/td><\/tr>\n      <\/tbody>\n    <\/table><\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce&#8217;s 2021 final decision in the original investigation describes the goods in detail<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\" id=\"hsn-cite-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. They are <strong>aluminum foil 0.2 mm thick or less<\/strong>, sold in reels heavier than 25 pounds, of any width<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. The foil is made from an alloy with more than 92% aluminum<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some foil is outside the duty. The 2021 decision lists these exclusions<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Backed foil<\/strong>, meaning foil joined to paper, paperboard, plastic or similar material on one or both sides.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Etched capacitor foil<\/strong>, a special foil used inside electrical parts.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Foil cut to shape<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Foil coated with lubricant on one or both sides is still covered<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. Foil may be made to the ASTM B479 standard, but foil made to other standards is covered too<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which tariff codes does the order list?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The 2021 decision says the goods usually enter under these U.S. tariff codes (Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, HTSUS): 7607.11.3000, 7607.11.6090, 7607.11.9030, 7607.11.9060, 7607.11.9090 and 7607.19.6000<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. It adds that covered foil may also enter under some codes in heading 7606<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The written description decides what is covered, not the code alone. A reel that matches the description pays the duty even under another code. Where nominal and actual measurements differ, the foil is covered if either one places it inside the description<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How has CBA&#8217;s rate changed since 2021?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">CBA&#8217;s rate has moved with each review. In the original investigation, Commerce set CBA&#8217;s rate at <strong>13.93%<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. The same 13.93% became the &quot;all-others&quot; rate for Brazilian makers not reviewed on their own<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v4\" data-at=\"how-has-cba-s-rate-changed-since-2021\">\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__chart\">\n    <h4>CBA&#8217;s anti-dumping rate on aluminum foil, %<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__bar\" data-series=\"1\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">2021 investigation<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__bartrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__barfill\" data-v=\"75\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">13.93%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__bar\" data-series=\"2\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">2022-2023 review<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__bartrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__barfill\" data-v=\"100\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">18.74%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__bar\" data-series=\"3\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">2023-2024 preliminary<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__bartrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__barfill\" data-v=\"90\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">16.61%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__bar\" data-series=\"4\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">2023-2024 final<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__bartrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__barfill\" data-v=\"75\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">13.65%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Another Brazilian maker, Arconic Ind. E Com de Metias LTDA, received 63.05% in the investigation<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce gave that rate because the company did not answer its questions on time<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the review covering Nov. 1, 2022, to Oct. 31, 2023, Commerce set CBA&#8217;s rate at 18.74%<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. That decision was published on Sept. 12, 2025<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the current period, Commerce first proposed 16.61% in its preliminary results of May 7, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The final rate is <strong>13.65%<\/strong>, below both the preliminary rate and the previous review<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why did the rate fall from 16.61%?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce invited comments on its preliminary results and changed its calculations after reading them<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The detailed reasons are in a separate &quot;Issues and Decision Memorandum&quot; that accompanies the notice<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice lists the three questions the parties argued about<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Single company or two<\/strong>: whether to treat CBA Aluminio and CBA Itapissuma as a single company.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Billing adjustments<\/strong>: whether to add taxes linked to billing adjustments to the gross sales price.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Insurance costs<\/strong>: whether insurance costs were correctly taken off the export price.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On the first question, nobody objected to Commerce&#8217;s preliminary finding<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce kept treating the two CBA firms as one company, because they are linked<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The notice does not say which of the other changes lowered the rate.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What do importers pay at the border now?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The new deposit applies to foil <strong>entered, or withdrawn from a warehouse, for consumption on or after Oct. 30, 2026<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The importer pays the deposit to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) when the goods enter. The notice sets these deposit rates<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Foil exported by CBA pays 13.65%, the rate from this review.<\/li>\n<li>Foil from a company reviewed in an earlier stage of the case pays that company&#8217;s latest rate.<\/li>\n<li>Foil from a new exporter, made by a producer reviewed before, pays the producer&#8217;s latest rate.<\/li>\n<li>Foil from all other Brazilian makers and exporters pays the <strong>all-others rate of 13.93%<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These deposits stay in place until Commerce gives further notice<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. In practice, buyers of CBA foil now pay a slightly lower deposit than buyers of foil from unreviewed Brazilian makers.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How will customs settle the 2023-2024 shipments?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A cash deposit is only an estimate. The final duty on past shipments is fixed later, when CBP &quot;liquidates&quot; them, meaning it closes each import entry and settles the bill.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For CBA&#8217;s sales in the review period, Commerce worked out a separate rate for each importer<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. It divided the dumping found on that importer&#8217;s sales by the value of those sales<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Where an importer&#8217;s rate is <strong>below 0.5%<\/strong>, CBP will settle its entries without any anti-dumping duty<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Some CBA foil reached the United States through other traders, without CBA knowing its destination. Those entries will be settled at the all-others rate, if the trader has no rate of its own<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce plans to send its instructions to CBP <strong>no earlier than 35 days<\/strong> after Oct. 30, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. If a party goes to the U.S. Court of International Trade in time, CBP will wait<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. It will not settle the entries until the period for asking the court to block them ends, within 90 days of publication<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What paperwork must importers file?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice repeats a long-standing rule for importers<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Before entries are settled, each importer must file a <strong>certificate on reimbursement<\/strong> of anti-dumping duties<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The certificate states whether the foreign seller paid back the duty to the importer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If an importer does not file it, Commerce may assume the duty was paid back. The importer could then face <strong>double anti-dumping duties<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce will also share its calculations with the parties to the case<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. It plans to do so within five days of publication or of any public announcement<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How long did the review take?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce started this review on Dec. 18, 2024, after timely requests from parties<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. It first extended the deadline for its preliminary results by 90 days<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v4\" data-at=\"how-long-did-the-review-take\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__axis\">\n    <h4>The 2023-2024 review<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">18 Dec 2024<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Review starts<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">7 May 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Preliminary rate<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evsub\">16.61%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">30 Oct 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Final rate, new deposits<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evsub\">13.65%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. government shutdown then added delays. On Nov. 14, 2025, Commerce paused all its case deadlines by 47 days, during the lapse in government funding<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. On Nov. 24, 2025, it added 21 more days, because of a backlog of electronic filings<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The preliminary deadline was finally moved to April 30, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The preliminary results appeared on May 7, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. Parties then had 21 days to file written arguments, called case briefs<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The final results followed on Oct. 30, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key points on the Brazilian aluminum foil duty<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The table sums up the final review results for CBA&#8217;s aluminum foil.<\/p>\n<div class=\"hsn-table\">\n<div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Question<\/th><th>Answer<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>Who issued it?<\/td><td>U.S. Department of Commerce<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>What is it?<\/td><td>Final results of an anti-dumping review<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Which goods?<\/td><td>Aluminum foil 0.2 mm or thinner, in reels over 25 pounds<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Which company?<\/td><td>CBA (Companhia Brasileira de Alum\u00ednio and CBA Itapissuma)<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Final rate for CBA<\/td><td>13.65%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Preliminary rate<\/td><td>16.61%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Rate for other Brazilian makers<\/td><td>13.93% all-others rate<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Sales period reviewed<\/td><td>Nov. 1, 2023, to Oct. 31, 2024<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>New deposits start<\/td><td>Oct. 30, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who pays?<\/td><td>U.S. importers, as cash deposits at entry<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Paperwork<\/td><td>Certificate on reimbursement of duties<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Next step<\/td><td>Instructions to customs, no earlier than 35 days after Oct. 30, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From Oct. 30, 2026, CBA&#8217;s foil enters the United States with a 13.65% deposit instead of 18.74%. Commerce will send its settlement instructions to customs no earlier than 35 days after publication<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading hsn-refs-title\">Sources<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"hsn-refs\">\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-1\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-1\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 1 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2026-22126\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      Certain Aluminum Foil From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2026-22126<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-2\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-2\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 2 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/07\/2026-09017\/certain-aluminum-foil-from-brazil-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      Certain Aluminum Foil From Brazil: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/07\/2026-09017\/certain-aluminum-foil-from-brazil-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-3\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-3\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 3 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2025\/09\/12\/2025-17679\/certain-aluminum-foil-from-brazil-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2022-2023\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      Certain Aluminum Foil From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2025\/09\/12\/2025-17679\/certain-aluminum-foil-from-brazil-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2022-2023<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-4\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-4\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 4 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/downloads.regulations.gov\/ITA_FRDOC_0001-7490\/content.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">content.pdf<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/downloads.regulations.gov\/ITA_FRDOC_0001-7490\/content.pdf<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>United States sets a final 13.65% anti-dumping deposit on aluminum foil from Brazilian maker CBA, starting Oct. 30, 2026.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2824,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_regnews_id":"36023","_hsn_citations":"[{\"n\":1,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/d\/2026-22126\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      Certain Aluminum Foil From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024\"},{\"n\":2,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/07\/2026-09017\/certain-aluminum-foil-from-brazil-preliminary-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      Certain Aluminum Foil From Brazil: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024\"},{\"n\":3,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2025\/09\/12\/2025-17679\/certain-aluminum-foil-from-brazil-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2022-2023\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      Certain Aluminum Foil From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2022-2023\"},{\"n\":4,\"url\":\"https:\/\/downloads.regulations.gov\/ITA_FRDOC_0001-7490\/content.pdf\",\"label\":\"content.pdf\"}]","_hsn_no_sources":"","_hsn_content_hash":"afa76af9594f7088d2269983593fb4be6ffc9d62:864ee61ceace707edd5fba9dd7a520b9a9b7e7ad","_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"aluminum foil","footnotes":""},"categories":[148,71],"tags":[20],"class_list":["post-2825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-americas","category-trade-agreements-tariffs","tag-united-states-of-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2825"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2826,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2825\/revisions\/2826"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2824"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}