{"id":2632,"date":"2026-10-16T16:51:20","date_gmt":"2026-10-16T16:51:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-sets-final-6-51-dumping-margin-on-norwegian-dissolving-pulp\/"},"modified":"2026-10-16T16:51:22","modified_gmt":"2026-10-16T16:51:22","slug":"us-sets-final-6-51-dumping-margin-on-norwegian-dissolving-pulp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-sets-final-6-51-dumping-margin-on-norwegian-dissolving-pulp\/","title":{"rendered":"US Sets Final 6.51% Dumping Margin on Norwegian Dissolving Pulp"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph hsn-lede\">United States sets a final 6.51% anti-dumping margin on high purity dissolving pulp from Norway, applicable Oct. 16, 2026.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. Department of Commerce set a final dumping margin of 6.51% on high purity dissolving pulp from Norway, applicable Oct. 16, 2026.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision appeared in the Federal Register on Oct. 16, 2026, and confirms an earlier preliminary finding<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\" id=\"hsn-cite-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce found that the pulp is being, or is likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, U.S. importers of this Norwegian pulp keep paying a cash deposit at the border. The deposit rate now falls slightly, from 6.54% to 6.51% of the value, and a final duty order depends on one more vote.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What did Commerce decide on Norwegian pulp?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce made a final affirmative determination of dumping. Dumping means selling goods abroad below their normal price, usually the price in the home market. An anti-dumping duty is an extra import tax that offsets that price gap.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v2\" data-at=\"what-did-commerce-decide-on-norwegian-pulp\">\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__cols\">\n    <h4>Dumping margin on Norwegian pulp, %<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"1\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">6.54%<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"100\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Preliminary, May 2026<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"1\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">6.51%<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"100\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Final, Oct. 2026<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final margin is <strong>6.51%<\/strong> for Borregaard AS, the Norwegian producer that Commerce examined<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The same <strong>6.51% rate applies to all other<\/strong> Norwegian producers and exporters<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. In the preliminary decision of May 27, 2026, both rates were 6.54%<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\" id=\"hsn-cite-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice was dated Oct. 9, 2026, and signed by Scot Fullerton, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The International Trade Administration, the part of Commerce that runs trade cases, issued it under case number A-403-808<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which pulp is covered by the case?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The goods are a very pure, very white wood or plant pulp. Factories dissolve it to make other products. The case calls it <strong>high purity dissolving pulp<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v2\" data-at=\"which-pulp-is-covered-by-the-case\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__table\">\n    <h4>Tests that bring pulp into the case<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n      <thead>\n        <tr><th>Requirement<\/th><th>Standard \/ Details<\/th><\/tr>\n      <\/thead>\n      <tbody>\n        <tr><th>Purity<\/th><td>At least 90% alpha cellulose, ISO 692:1982<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Brightness<\/th><td>90% or higher, ISO 2470-1:2016<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Viscosity<\/th><td>Pulp under 455 mL\/g is excluded, ISO 5351:2010<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Form<\/th><td>Slurry, flakes, powder, pellets, rolls, sheets and more<\/td><\/tr>\n      <\/tbody>\n    <\/table><\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">To be covered, the pulp must meet two tests<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Purity:<\/strong> at least 90% by weight of alpha cellulose, the purest form of cellulose, measured on a dry basis under the ISO 692:1982 standard.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Brightness:<\/strong> a brightness level of 90% or higher, measured under the ISO 2470-1:2016 standard.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The fibre source does not matter. Hardwoods, softwoods, farm crops, crop waste, recycled fibre and industrial waste all count<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The pulp may be made by the kraft (sulfate) process, the sulfite process, or both<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The form of shipment does not matter either. The rule covers liquid slurry and dry forms such as flakes, powder, granules, pellets, shreds, rolls and sheets<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which pulp is left out?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two kinds of pulp are excluded<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Low-viscosity pulp:<\/strong> high purity pulp with an intrinsic viscosity under 455 milliliters per gram, measured under ISO 5351:2010. Viscosity here describes how thick the pulp is when dissolved.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Cotton linters pulp:<\/strong> pulp made of at least 90% by weight of cotton linters fibres, the short fibres left on cotton seeds.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce received no comments on its scope decision of May 18, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. It therefore made no changes to the product description used when the case began<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which tariff codes should importers check?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The pulp normally enters under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) codes <strong>4702.00.0020 and 4702.00.0040<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. It may also enter under codes 4706.30.0000 or 4706.92.0100<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The codes are given for convenience only. The written product description decides what is covered, not the code<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. A shipment under another code can still owe deposits if the pulp meets the description.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Does pulp processed in another country escape the duty?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The scope covers Norwegian pulp that is finished, packaged or processed in a third country<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Examples given are mixing, blending, diluting and repackaging<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Blends are also covered. When Norwegian pulp is mixed with pulp from other sources, the Norwegian part is subject to the case<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Only that part counts, not the whole blend<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How do the cash deposits work at the border?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to keep holding the final duty bill open. In legal terms, CBP will continue to suspend liquidation, meaning it delays the final calculation of duties on each entry<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This applies to covered pulp entered, or taken out of a warehouse for sale, <strong>on or after May 27, 2026<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. That is the date the preliminary decision was published<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From the publication of the final notice, CBP must collect a cash deposit at these rates<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>If Borregaard exports the pulp, the deposit equals Borregaard&#8217;s own rate of 6.51%.<\/li>\n<li>If the exporter is not on the list but the producer is, the deposit equals the producer&#8217;s rate.<\/li>\n<li>All other producers and exporters pay the all-others rate of 6.51%.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A cash deposit is money paid at entry as security for the possible duty. These deposit rules stay in force until further notice<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How was the 6.51% rate reached?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The period of investigation ran from <strong>July 1, 2024, to June 30, 2025<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce compared Borregaard&#8217;s U.S. sales prices with the normal value of its pulp in that period<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In June and July 2026, Commerce checked Borregaard&#8217;s sales and cost figures<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Staff examined sales and accounting records and original documents from the company<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The verification reports are dated July 27, 2026, for sales and Aug. 17, 2026, for costs<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce then changed some of its calculations for Borregaard after the preliminary decision<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The one issue argued by the parties was which comparison market Commerce should use<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. That market sets the normal price against which U.S. sales are measured.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Borregaard was the only company examined. U.S. law sets the rate for unexamined companies as an average of the examined ones&#8217; rates<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. With only one rate, which was not zero or tiny, Borregaard&#8217;s 6.51% became the all-others rate<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who asked for the duties and why?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case began with petitions filed on <strong>Aug. 12, 2025<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\" id=\"hsn-cite-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. They were filed by Rayonier Advanced Materials, Inc., of Jacksonville, Florida, and the United Steelworkers union<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. The union&#8217;s full name is the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The petitioners claimed that U.S. industry was hurt by unfairly priced pulp imports from Brazil and Norway<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. They also claimed that pulp from Brazil was subsidized by its government<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce opened its dumping investigations on Sept. 8, 2025<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), an independent agency that judges harm to U.S. industry, voted in its first phase on Sept. 26, 2025<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. It found a reasonable sign that U.S. industry was materially injured by these imports<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why did the case take more than a year?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. federal government shutdown delayed the case. On Nov. 14, 2025, Commerce paused all its trade case deadlines by 47 days<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. On Nov. 24, 2025, it added another 21 days because of a backlog of filings<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On Feb. 18, 2026, Commerce also postponed the preliminary decision to May 18, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. After that decision, Borregaard asked on May 11, 2026, to delay the final decision<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce agreed. It set the final decision at no more than 135 days after the preliminary one<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. It also extended the provisional deposits from four months to no more than six months<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The final deadline became Oct. 9, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What happens next with the ITC vote?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce will now notify the ITC of its final finding<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The ITC must decide <strong>within 45 days<\/strong> whether U.S. industry is materially injured, or threatened with injury, by these imports<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v2\" data-at=\"what-happens-next-with-the-itc-vote\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__axis\">\n    <h4>Key dates in the pulp case<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Aug. 12, 2025<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Petitions filed<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">May 27, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Deposits start at 6.54%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Oct. 16, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Final rate of 6.51%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Nov. 2, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Final comments to ITC<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ITC held its final hearing on Oct. 8, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\" id=\"hsn-cite-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. Posthearing briefs were due Oct. 15, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. On Oct. 29, 2026, the ITC will release the remaining information to the parties, who may send final comments by <strong>Nov. 2, 2026<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There are two possible results<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>If the ITC finds no injury:<\/strong> the case ends, all cash deposits are refunded, and CBP lifts the hold on entries.<\/li>\n<li><strong>If the ITC finds injury:<\/strong> Commerce will issue an anti-dumping duty order. CBP will then collect duties on covered pulp entered on or after May 27, 2026.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The same ITC case also covers dissolving pulp from Brazil, under investigation numbers 701-TA-777 and 731-TA-1762-1763<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who is affected by the Norway pulp duty?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">U.S. importers pay the deposit at entry. They carry the cost until the ITC decides and the final duty is set.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Borregaard and other Norwegian makers face a 6.51% charge on their U.S. sales. Traders who blend or repack Norwegian pulp in a third country remain inside the rule<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Customs brokers must check each shipment against the purity, brightness and viscosity tests. The product description, not the tariff code, decides whether the deposit is due<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key points on the Norway dissolving pulp duty<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The table sums up the final decision and the next steps.<\/p>\n<div class=\"hsn-table\">\n<div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Question<\/th><th>Answer<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>What changed?<\/td><td>Final dumping finding on Norwegian pulp<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who issued it?<\/td><td>U.S. Department of Commerce<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Which goods?<\/td><td>High purity dissolving pulp from Norway<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Main tariff codes<\/td><td>4702.00.0020 and 4702.00.0040<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Final rate for Borregaard AS<\/td><td>6.51%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Rate for all others<\/td><td>6.51%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Preliminary rate<\/td><td>6.54%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who pays?<\/td><td>U.S. importers, as cash deposits<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Entries covered from<\/td><td>May 27, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Applicable from<\/td><td>Oct. 16, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Next step<\/td><td>ITC injury vote within 45 days<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Exclusions<\/td><td>Low-viscosity pulp and cotton linters pulp<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ITC&#8217;s injury vote now decides the case. A finding of injury brings a duty order at 6.51%, and a finding of no injury refunds every deposit paid since May 27, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading hsn-refs-title\">Sources<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"hsn-refs\">\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-1\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-1\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 1 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/16\/2026-21140\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-norway-final-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than-fair\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Norway: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/16\/2026-21140\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-norway-final-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than-fair<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-2\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-2\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 2 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/27\/2026-10527\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-norway-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Norway: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/27\/2026-10527\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-norway-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-3\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-3\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 3 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2025\/09\/30\/2025-19027\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-and-norway-determinations\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil and Norway; Determinations<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2025\/09\/30\/2025-19027\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-and-norway-determinations<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-4\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-4\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 4 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/10\/2026-11617\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-and-norway-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil and Norway; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/10\/2026-11617\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-and-norway-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>United States sets a final 6.51% anti-dumping margin on high purity dissolving pulp from Norway, applicable Oct. 16, 2026.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2630,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_regnews_id":"35781","_hsn_citations":"[{\"n\":1,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/16\/2026-21140\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-norway-final-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than-fair\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Norway: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value\"},{\"n\":2,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/27\/2026-10527\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-norway-preliminary-affirmative-determination-of-sales-at-less-than\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Norway: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Extension of Provisional Measures\"},{\"n\":3,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2025\/09\/30\/2025-19027\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-and-norway-determinations\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil and Norway; Determinations\"},{\"n\":4,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/10\/2026-11617\/high-purity-dissolving-pulp-from-brazil-and-norway-scheduling-of-the-final-phase-of-countervailing\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      High Purity Dissolving Pulp From Brazil and Norway; Scheduling of the Final Phase of Countervailing Duty and Antidumping Duty Investigations\"}]","_hsn_no_sources":"","_hsn_content_hash":"80cc908cd981e0f1e040d9d7d9de1f22c4a91b48:5ba5b4e3e794439b7b7ed6b4da9b8583b1998938","_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"dissolving pulp","footnotes":""},"categories":[148,8],"tags":[20],"class_list":["post-2632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-americas","category-trade-regulation","tag-united-states-of-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2632"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2632\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2634,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2632\/revisions\/2634"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}