{"id":2551,"date":"2026-10-11T18:26:50","date_gmt":"2026-10-11T18:26:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-sets-final-subsidy-duties-on-korean-hot-rolled-steel-from-oct-9\/"},"modified":"2026-10-11T18:26:52","modified_gmt":"2026-10-11T18:26:52","slug":"us-sets-final-subsidy-duties-on-korean-hot-rolled-steel-from-oct-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-sets-final-subsidy-duties-on-korean-hot-rolled-steel-from-oct-9\/","title":{"rendered":"US Sets Final Subsidy Duties on Korean Hot-Rolled Steel from Oct. 9, 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph hsn-lede\">United States sets final countervailing duty rates of 1.28% for Hyundai Steel and 3.68% for POSCO on Korean hot-rolled steel, with new cash deposits from Oct. 9, 2026.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. Department of Commerce on Oct. 9, 2026, set final anti-subsidy duty rates of 1.28% for Hyundai Steel and 3.68% for POSCO on hot-rolled steel flat products from South Korea, with new cash deposits applying to shipments entered from that day<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\" id=\"hsn-cite-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rates close the department&#8217;s administrative review of the countervailing duty order on this steel, covering shipments made in 2023<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, U.S. buyers of hot-rolled steel made by Hyundai Steel or POSCO will pay these rates as a deposit at the border from now on. The same rates will also fix the final duty owed on the companies&#8217; shipments that entered the United States during 2023.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What did Commerce decide on Korean hot-rolled steel?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce published its final results in the Federal Register on Oct. 9, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The notice found that Hyundai Steel Company and POSCO received <strong>countervailable subsidies<\/strong>, which are government help that the U.S. can offset with an extra import tax<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The review covered the period from <strong>Jan. 1, 2023, to Dec. 31, 2023<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce set one subsidy rate for each company, expressed as a share of the value of the goods:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Hyundai Steel Company: 1.28%<\/strong> of the value of the steel<\/li>\n<li><strong>POSCO: 3.68%<\/strong> of the value of the steel<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These rates are &quot;ad valorem&quot;, which means they are charged as a percentage of the declared value of each shipment<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The notice is dated Oct. 6, 2026, and was signed by Scot Fullerton, the acting deputy assistant secretary in charge of anti-dumping and countervailing duty operations<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why does the U.S. charge a subsidy duty on this steel?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A countervailing duty is an extra import tax that cancels out the benefit a foreign maker gets from its own government. The order on Korean hot-rolled steel was first published on Oct. 3, 2016<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\" id=\"hsn-cite-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. An administrative review checks how much subsidy the Korean makers really received in a given period<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For each program it counts, Commerce must find three things<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The government must give a financial contribution, that contribution must give the company a benefit, and the help must be &quot;specific&quot;, meaning aimed at certain firms or industries rather than open to all<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce ran the review under section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The reasoning for each program is in a longer paper called the Issues and Decision Memorandum<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The final notice lists the questions that paper answers. They show which kinds of Korean government help were under dispute.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which Korean programs did the parties argue over?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final notice lists <strong>eight issues<\/strong> raised by the parties in their written arguments<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. They cover energy, loans, carbon permits and even a workplace benefit:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Cheap electricity:<\/strong> whether the Government of Korea subsidizes the electricity it supplies<\/li>\n<li><strong>Carbon permits:<\/strong> whether permits under the Korea Emissions Trading System (K-ETS) count as a subsidy<\/li>\n<li><strong>POSCO International&#8217;s electricity:<\/strong> whether Commerce wrongly added electricity benefits received by POSCO International Corporation to POSCO&#8217;s rate<\/li>\n<li><strong>Electricity price benchmark:<\/strong> whether Commerce chose the right comparison price for electricity<\/li>\n<li><strong>Overseas investment loan:<\/strong> whether a loan to POSCO International from the Korea Export-Import Bank (KEXIM) is tied to other products<\/li>\n<li><strong>Benchmark for that loan:<\/strong> whether Commerce should change the comparison rate for it<\/li>\n<li><strong>Export growth loans:<\/strong> whether to change the comparison interest rate for a KEXIM export growth loan program<\/li>\n<li><strong>Workplace nurseries:<\/strong> whether a program for building and running workplace childcare centers is a subsidy<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice itself does not give the answer to each question. It points readers to the Issues and Decision Memorandum for the full discussion<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How did the rates change since April?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce published its preliminary results on April 10, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. At that stage it set <strong>1.28% for Hyundai Steel and 3.71% for POSCO<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v4\" data-at=\"how-did-the-rates-change-since-april\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__table\">\n    <h4>Subsidy rates, preliminary and final<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n      <thead>\n        <tr><th>Company<\/th><th>April 10, 2026<\/th><th>Oct. 9, 2026<\/th><\/tr>\n      <\/thead>\n      <tbody>\n        <tr><th>Hyundai Steel<\/th><td>1.28%<\/td><td>1.28%<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>POSCO<\/th><td>3.71%<\/td><td>3.68%<\/td><\/tr>\n      <\/tbody>\n    <\/table><\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">After reading comments from the parties, Commerce made &quot;certain changes&quot; to the way it worked out POSCO&#8217;s rate<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. POSCO&#8217;s final rate fell to 3.68%, a drop of 0.03 percentage points. Hyundai Steel&#8217;s rate stayed at 1.28%<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The change is small, but it applies to every POSCO shipment that the review covers. The notice does not say which program caused the cut; that detail is also in the Issues and Decision Memorandum<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final results were late compared with the first plan. On Aug. 7, 2026, Commerce moved its deadline to Sept. 30, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. On Sept. 29, 2026, it added seven more days, to Oct. 7, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which companies does the review cover?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce started this review on Nov. 14, 2024<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. On Dec. 17, 2024, it chose Hyundai Steel and POSCO as the <strong>mandatory respondents<\/strong>, the companies it examines in full<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v4\" data-at=\"which-companies-does-the-review-cover\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__axis\">\n    <h4>Steps in the 2023 review<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Nov. 14, 2024<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Review started<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Dec. 17, 2024<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Hyundai Steel and POSCO chosen<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">March 9, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Plan to drop 13 companies<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each rate also covers related companies that Commerce treats as one group with the named firm. Hyundai Green Power Co. Ltd is counted together with Hyundai Steel<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The POSCO rate covers these linked firms<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>POSCO Future M<\/li>\n<li>POSCO Holdings<\/li>\n<li>POSCO M-Tech<\/li>\n<li>POSCO Nippon Steel RHF Joint Venture Co., Ltd.<\/li>\n<li>POSCO Mobility Solutions<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">POSCO also sold some steel through its trading company, POSCO International Corporation<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce examined that company as part of POSCO, and its subsidies are included in POSCO&#8217;s 3.68% rate<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The review originally reached further. In April, Commerce dropped <strong>13 companies<\/strong> from the review because the records showed they had no shipments of this steel under suspended duties during 2023<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. No party objected when Commerce announced that plan on March 9, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What happens at the U.S. border now?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The final notice changes two things for importers: the deposit on new shipments and the final bill on old ones.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For new shipments, Commerce will tell U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect <strong>cash deposits<\/strong>, money paid at entry as security for the duty<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The deposits apply at the new company rates to steel entered, or taken out of a bonded warehouse for sale, <strong>on or after Oct. 9, 2026<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. They stay in place until Commerce says otherwise<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For steel from firms that were not reviewed, nothing changes. CBP will keep collecting deposits at each firm&#8217;s latest company rate, or at the &quot;all-others&quot; rate where no company rate applies<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For shipments that entered during 2023, CBP will set the final duty at the new rates<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. This process is called <strong>liquidation<\/strong>, the final settling of the duty on an import entry. Importers who paid a deposit at a different rate will either pay the difference or get money back.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When will customs settle the 2023 entries?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce plans to send its assessment instructions to CBP <strong>no earlier than 35 days<\/strong> after the Oct. 9 publication<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Those instructions tell customs to charge the final rates on the 2023 entries.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">There is one condition. If a party files a timely summons at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the instructions will tell CBP to wait<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. CBP will then hold off on liquidating the affected entries until the time to ask for a court order to stop it has passed, which is <strong>within 90 days<\/strong> of publication<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce also said it will show its calculations to the interested parties within five days of publication<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Parties that disagree with the numbers can use these to prepare a court challenge.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How does this fit with the anti-dumping duties?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Korean hot-rolled steel faces a second, separate duty. An <strong>anti-dumping duty<\/strong> is an extra import tax on goods sold abroad below their normal price. On May 14, 2026, Commerce published the final results of its anti-dumping review of the same steel, covering sales from Oct. 1, 2023, to Sept. 30, 2024<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\" id=\"hsn-cite-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v4\" data-at=\"how-does-this-fit-with-the-anti-dumping-duties\">\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__chart\">\n    <h4>Anti-dumping margins on Korean hot-rolled steel, %<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__bar\" data-series=\"1\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">All other makers<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__bartrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__barfill\" data-v=\"100\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">6.05%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__bar\" data-series=\"2\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Hyundai Steel<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__bartrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__barfill\" data-v=\"25\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">1.49%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__bar\" data-series=\"3\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">POSCO<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__bartrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__barfill\" data-v=\"20\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">1.22%<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That review set dumping margins of <strong>1.49% for Hyundai Steel<\/strong> and <strong>1.22% for POSCO and POSCO International Corporation<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. For other Korean makers not covered by any review, the anti-dumping deposit stays at 6.05%, the rate set in the original investigation<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The two duties answer different questions. The anti-dumping duty targets low prices, while the countervailing duty targets government help. An importer of Korean hot-rolled steel may therefore pay a deposit under both orders on the same shipment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The anti-dumping notice also reminded importers of a paperwork rule<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. Before liquidation, importers must file a certificate saying whether the foreign seller paid back any anti-dumping or countervailing duties<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. Without it, Commerce may presume such repayment happened and double the anti-dumping duty, or raise it by the amount of the countervailing duty<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key points on the Korean hot-rolled steel subsidy duties<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The table sums up the final results of the 2023 review.<\/p>\n<div class=\"hsn-table\">\n<div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Question<\/th><th>Answer<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>What changed?<\/td><td>Final subsidy duty rates set<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who issued it?<\/td><td>U.S. Department of Commerce<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Which goods?<\/td><td>Hot-rolled steel flat products from Korea<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Period reviewed<\/td><td>Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2023<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Hyundai Steel rate<\/td><td>1.28%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>POSCO rate<\/td><td>3.68% (3.71% in April)<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>New deposits apply from<\/td><td>Oct. 9, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who collects?<\/td><td>U.S. Customs and Border Protection<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Companies dropped from review<\/td><td>13<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Customs instructions<\/td><td>No earlier than 35 days after Oct. 9<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Separate anti-dumping margins<\/td><td>1.49% Hyundai, 1.22% POSCO<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">From Oct. 9, 2026, each new U.S. shipment of hot-rolled steel from Hyundai Steel or POSCO carries a deposit at the new rate<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Commerce&#8217;s instructions to settle the 2023 entries can go to customs no earlier than 35 days after that date<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading hsn-refs-title\">Sources<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"hsn-refs\">\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-1\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-1\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 1 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/09\/2026-20778\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-countervailing\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register :: Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/09\/2026-20778\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-countervailing<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-2\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-2\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 2 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/04\/10\/2026-07001\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-and-rescission\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register :: Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/04\/10\/2026-07001\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-and-rescission<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-3\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-3\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 3 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/14\/2026-09707\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-antidumping-duty\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register :: Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/14\/2026-09707\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-antidumping-duty<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>United States sets final countervailing duty rates of 1.28% for Hyundai Steel and 3.68% for POSCO on Korean hot-rolled steel, with new cash deposits from\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2549,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_regnews_id":"35735","_hsn_citations":"[{\"n\":1,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/09\/2026-20778\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-countervailing\",\"label\":\"Federal Register :: Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023\"},{\"n\":2,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/04\/10\/2026-07001\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-and-rescission\",\"label\":\"Federal Register :: Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023\"},{\"n\":3,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/05\/14\/2026-09707\/certain-hot-rolled-steel-flat-products-from-the-republic-of-korea-final-results-of-antidumping-duty\",\"label\":\"Federal Register :: Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024\"}]","_hsn_no_sources":"","_hsn_content_hash":"4ec71cbf746ac84d3d90c8b436949b8fc4b9c4ce:fba1dd9385322347a1f5185af95f00cfd1ba8a45","_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"hot-rolled steel","footnotes":""},"categories":[148,71],"tags":[20],"class_list":["post-2551","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-americas","category-trade-agreements-tariffs","tag-united-states-of-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2551","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2551"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2551\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2553,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2551\/revisions\/2553"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2549"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2551"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2551"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2551"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}