{"id":2478,"date":"2026-10-06T01:10:42","date_gmt":"2026-10-06T01:10:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-keeps-anti-dumping-duties-on-chinese-and-russian-steel-plate\/"},"modified":"2026-10-06T01:10:43","modified_gmt":"2026-10-06T01:10:43","slug":"us-keeps-anti-dumping-duties-on-chinese-and-russian-steel-plate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-keeps-anti-dumping-duties-on-chinese-and-russian-steel-plate\/","title":{"rendered":"US Keeps Anti-Dumping Duties on Chinese and Russian Steel Plate"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph hsn-lede\">United States: Commerce found that ending anti-dumping orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from China and Russia would likely bring back dumping, in final results applicable from Oct. 5, 2026.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. Department of Commerce has found that ending its anti-dumping duty orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from China and Russia would likely bring back dumping, in final results applicable from Oct. 5, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\" id=\"hsn-cite-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision closes Commerce&#8217;s part of the fifth five-year &quot;sunset&quot; review of the two orders. A sunset review is a check, every five years, of whether an old trade remedy is still needed<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\" id=\"hsn-cite-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, the extra import taxes on this steel plate from China and Russia do not end now. Commerce says that without them, dumping could return at margins of up to 128.59% for China and 185.00% for Russia<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What did Commerce decide on steel plate?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce found that revoking the orders &quot;would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping&quot;<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Dumping means selling goods abroad below their normal price. An <strong>anti-dumping duty<\/strong> is an extra import tax that U.S. customs collects to offset that low price.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice covers two separate orders. One applies to plate from China, under case number A-570-849. The other applies to plate from Russia, under case number A-821-808<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice was signed on Sept. 29, 2026, by Scot Fullerton, Commerce&#8217;s acting deputy assistant secretary for anti-dumping and countervailing duty operations<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. It appeared in the Federal Register, the U.S. government&#8217;s daily official journal, on <strong>Oct. 5, 2026<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\" id=\"hsn-cite-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How large are the dumping margins for China and Russia?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce also had to estimate how deep the dumping would be if the orders ended. It calls this &quot;the magnitude of the dumping margins likely to prevail&quot;<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v2\" data-at=\"how-large-are-the-dumping-margins-for-china-and-russia\">\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__cols\">\n    <h4>Likely dumping margin if orders ended, %<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"1\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">185.00%<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"100\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Russia<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"2\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">128.59%<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"70\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">China (up to)<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Its answer is <strong>up to 128.59% for China<\/strong> and <strong>185.00% for Russia<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. These are weighted-average margins, which means an average across sales, with larger sales counting more.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A margin of 185.00% means the U.S. price would be far below the normal price in the home market. Commerce reports these figures to the International Trade Commission (ITC), the U.S. agency that judges harm to American industry<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The notice does not say that these figures are new cash deposit rates for importers.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which steel plate goods are covered?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The goods are certain cut-to-length carbon steel plate, which Commerce shortens to &quot;CTL plate&quot;<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. This is flat steel plate that has been cut into separate sheets of set length, rather than sold in rolls.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The notice gives only a short scope: &quot;CTL plate from China and Russia.&quot; The full product description sits in a separate paper, the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which Commerce adopted with the notice<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ITC describes the matching U.S. product as cut-to-length plate made by U.S. mills or cut from coiled plate by service centers. In past reviews it also included plate made from micro-alloy steel<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\" id=\"hsn-cite-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why did Commerce keep the plate orders?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision rests on who took part in the review. Three U.S. steelmakers told Commerce they wanted to take part<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.<\/strong>, which filed its notice on June 16, 2026<\/li>\n<li><strong>Nucor Corporation<\/strong>, which filed on June 16, 2026<\/li>\n<li><strong>SSAB Enterprises LLC<\/strong>, which filed on June 9, 2026<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These companies then filed full written responses on July 1, 2026, one for China and one for Russia<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. No foreign producer, exporter or importer filed a full response<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under its rules, Commerce then ran an <strong>expedited review<\/strong>, a shorter 120-day review based on the papers it already had<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The reasons in detail, including the likelihood of more dumping, are set out in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Its topics include separate sections for China and for Russia<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How long have the steel plate orders been in force?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These orders are old. Commerce first suspended its anti-dumping investigations into this plate from China, Russia and Ukraine on Oct. 24, 1997<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. A suspension means the case is paused under an agreement with the exporting country.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v2\" data-at=\"how-long-have-the-steel-plate-orders-been-in-force\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__table\">\n    <h4>The two plate orders side by side<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n      <thead>\n        <tr><th>Question<\/th><th>China<\/th><th>Russia<\/th><\/tr>\n      <\/thead>\n      <tbody>\n        <tr><th>Case number<\/th><td>A-570-849<\/td><td>A-821-808<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Order published<\/th><td>Oct. 21, 2003<\/td><td>Aug. 14, 2023<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Likely margin<\/th><td>Up to 128.59%<\/td><td>185.00%<\/td><\/tr>\n      <\/tbody>\n    <\/table><\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For China, the agreement ended and an anti-dumping order was published on Oct. 21, 2003<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The ITC notice says the China order took effect on Nov. 3, 2003<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. For Russia, the agreement ended and an order was issued on Aug. 14, 2023<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The orders or agreements were kept after earlier sunset reviews. Those continuations took effect on Sept. 17, 2003, Nov. 10, 2009, Dec. 21, 2015 and July 1, 2021<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. This is the <strong>fifth sunset review<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How did the review run, step by step?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce and the ITC opened the reviews together on June 1, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The process then followed fixed deadlines:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Commerce started the review automatically, as the Tariff Act of 1930 requires every five years<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>U.S. producers had 15 days to say they would take part. Without such a notice, Commerce would have ended the order automatically<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>All parties then had 30 days to file a full written response<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>Commerce told the ITC on June 22, 2026, that U.S. producers had joined<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>On July 27, 2026, Commerce told the ITC that no foreign side had filed a response<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>Commerce issued its final results, applicable on Oct. 5, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v2\" data-at=\"how-did-the-review-run-step-by-step\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__axis\">\n    <h4>The fifth sunset review in 2026<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">June 1, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Review opened<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">July 27, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">No foreign response reported<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Oct. 5, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Final results applicable<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Step 2 shows why the case went this way. Because only the U.S. side filed full responses, Commerce ran the short review<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is the ITC doing on steel plate?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce&#8217;s finding is only half of a sunset review. The ITC must also decide whether ending the measures would likely bring back <strong>material injury<\/strong>, meaning serious harm to U.S. steel plate makers<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ITC&#8217;s review covers plate from China, Russia and Ukraine, under investigation numbers 731-TA-753, 754 and 756<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. Responses to the ITC were due by <strong>July 1, 2026<\/strong>, and comments on whether those responses were enough were due by Aug. 10, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ITC asked U.S. producers for data on their 2025 production and capacity<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>. It also asked for lists of U.S. importers, and of foreign producers that exported this plate after 2019<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On Sept. 4, 2026, the ITC announced its &quot;adequacy determinations&quot; in the case<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\" id=\"hsn-cite-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>. These decide whether the ITC runs a full review or a short one. The ITC page reached for this story does not state which it chose.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who is affected by the plate decision?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>U.S. importers<\/strong> of this plate from China or Russia keep facing anti-dumping duties while the orders stay in place. <strong>Exporters and makers in China and Russia<\/strong> lose a chance to see the orders end in this round. They did not file a full response to Commerce, so the agency decided without their input<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>U.S. buyers<\/strong> of plate keep paying prices shaped by the duties. <strong>U.S. steelmakers<\/strong> such as Nucor, Cleveland-Cliffs and SSAB keep the protection they asked for<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Customs brokers handling these entries see no change to the rules for now. The orders continue in their current form.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What happens next for China and Russia plate?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The orders now depend on the ITC. If the ITC finds that ending them would likely harm U.S. producers again, the orders stay. If it does not, the orders can end.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Commerce published its final results under sections 751(c) and 752(c) of the Tariff Act<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The notice gives no date for the ITC&#8217;s final vote.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Parties who saw secret business data in the case must also return or destroy it under their protective order<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. This is the only reminder Commerce will send<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key points on the steel plate sunset review<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The table below sums up the decision.<\/p>\n<div class=\"hsn-table\">\n<div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Question<\/th><th>Answer<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>What changed?<\/td><td>Commerce found dumping would likely return<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who issued it?<\/td><td>U.S. Department of Commerce<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Which goods?<\/td><td>Cut-to-length carbon steel plate<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Which countries?<\/td><td>China and Russia<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Likely margin, China<\/td><td>Up to 128.59%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Likely margin, Russia<\/td><td>185.00%<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Type of review<\/td><td>Expedited fifth sunset review<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who took part?<\/td><td>Cleveland-Cliffs, Nucor, SSAB<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Foreign responses filed<\/td><td>None<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Applicable from<\/td><td>Oct. 5, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Next step<\/td><td>ITC decision on harm to U.S. industry<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The anti-dumping duties on this plate from China and Russia stay in place for now. Their future now rests on the ITC&#8217;s fifth review, which also covers plate from Ukraine<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading hsn-refs-title\">Sources<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"hsn-refs\">\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-1\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-1\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 1 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/05\/2026-20381\/certain-cut-to-length-carbon-steel-plate-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-and-the-russian\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People&#8217;s Republic of China and the Russian Federation: Final Results of the Expedited Fifth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/05\/2026-20381\/certain-cut-to-length-carbon-steel-plate-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-and-the-russian<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-2\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-2\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 2 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/01\/2026-10941\/initiation-of-five-year-sunset-reviews\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/01\/2026-10941\/initiation-of-five-year-sunset-reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-3\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-3\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 3 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2026-10-05\/pdf\/2026-20382.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">2026-20382.pdf<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2026-10-05\/pdf\/2026-20382.pdf<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-4\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-4\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 4 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/01\/2026-10914\/cut-to-length-carbon-steel-plate-from-china-russia-and-ukraine-institution-of-five-year-reviews\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Federal Register\n       :: \n      Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From China, Russia, and Ukraine; Institution of Five-Year Reviews<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/01\/2026-10914\/cut-to-length-carbon-steel-plate-from-china-russia-and-ukraine-institution-of-five-year-reviews<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-5\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-5\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 5 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/press_room\/news_release\/2026\/er0904_69189.htm\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Commission Adequacy Determinations: Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from China, Russia, and Ukraine | United States International Trade Commission<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/press_room\/news_release\/2026\/er0904_69189.htm<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>United States: Commerce found that ending anti-dumping orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from China and Russia would likely bring back dumping,\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2476,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_regnews_id":"35657","_hsn_citations":"[{\"n\":1,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/10\/05\/2026-20381\/certain-cut-to-length-carbon-steel-plate-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-and-the-russian\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From the People's Republic of China and the Russian Federation: Final Results of the Expedited Fifth Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders\"},{\"n\":2,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/01\/2026-10941\/initiation-of-five-year-sunset-reviews\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews\"},{\"n\":3,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.govinfo.gov\/content\/pkg\/FR-2026-10-05\/pdf\/2026-20382.pdf\",\"label\":\"2026-20382.pdf\"},{\"n\":4,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/06\/01\/2026-10914\/cut-to-length-carbon-steel-plate-from-china-russia-and-ukraine-institution-of-five-year-reviews\",\"label\":\"Federal Register\\n       :: \\n      Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From China, Russia, and Ukraine; Institution of Five-Year Reviews\"},{\"n\":5,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/press_room\/news_release\/2026\/er0904_69189.htm\",\"label\":\"Commission Adequacy Determinations: Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from China, Russia, and Ukraine | United States International Trade Commission\"}]","_hsn_no_sources":"","_hsn_content_hash":"7f3e0d92d24d7ceb36607cd9a87799c7945949a1:93f58338696013c8b462c9640c901745e011710e","_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"steel plate","footnotes":""},"categories":[148,71],"tags":[20],"class_list":["post-2478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-americas","category-trade-agreements-tariffs","tag-united-states-of-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2478","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2478"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2480,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2478\/revisions\/2480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2476"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}