{"id":2147,"date":"2026-09-28T06:19:18","date_gmt":"2026-09-28T06:19:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-opens-section-337-investigation-into-ddr5-memory-imports-over-four\/"},"modified":"2026-10-01T04:42:53","modified_gmt":"2026-10-01T04:42:53","slug":"us-opens-section-337-investigation-into-ddr5-memory-imports-over-four","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/us-opens-section-337-investigation-into-ddr5-memory-imports-over-four\/","title":{"rendered":"US Opens Patent Case That Could Bar DDR5 Server Memory Imports"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph hsn-lede\">United States International Trade Commission initiated a Section 337 investigation into certain dynamic random access memory devices, products containing the same, and components thereof following a complaint filed on August 11, 2026.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The U.S. International Trade Commission voted on Sept. 22, 2026, to open a patent investigation into imported DDR5 memory modules and the servers, computers and storage systems that contain them, a case that could end in a ban on those imports<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\" id=\"hsn-cite-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case, Investigation No. 337-TA-1523, follows a complaint filed on Aug. 11, 2026, by Netlist, Inc. of Irvine, California<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\" id=\"hsn-cite-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The Commission published its notice of institution in the Federal Register on Sept. 25, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In short, a California company says that some imported server memory copies its patented designs. If the Commission agrees, U.S. customs could stop shipments of these memory modules, and of servers built with them, from the named companies at the border.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is the Netlist complaint about?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Netlist filed its complaint under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, a U.S. law against unfair practices in import trade<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. A supplement to the complaint followed on Aug. 25, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The complaint says the goods break U.S. patent law when they are imported, sold for import, or sold in the United States after import<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under section 337, <strong>infringing a U.S. patent<\/strong> in import trade is an unlawful practice in itself<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\" id=\"hsn-cite-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. Infringing means making, using or selling something that a patent protects without the owner&#8217;s permission. In patent cases, the complaining company does not need to show that the imports injured it<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Netlist also says that an industry in the United States exists, or is being set up, for the patented products<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. This is a legal condition of every section 337 patent case. Netlist asks the Commission to issue <strong>a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders<\/strong><sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which memory products does the DRAM case cover?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The investigation covers &quot;certain DRAM devices (specifically, DDR5 generation DIMM), and products containing the same (such as servers, computing systems, and storage systems), and components thereof&quot;<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. In plain words, these are <strong>DDR5 memory modules<\/strong>, the plug-in memory cards used in computers and servers. DRAM stands for dynamic random access memory, the working memory of a computer.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v3\" data-at=\"which-memory-products-does-the-dram-case-cover\">\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__cols\">\n    <h4>Patent claims in the case, by Netlist patent<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"1\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">27 claims<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"100\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Patent 12,373,366<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"2\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">20 claims<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"75\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Patent 12,675,407<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"3\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">17 claims<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"65\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Patent 10,217,523<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__col\" data-series=\"4\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__num\">16 claims<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__coltrack\"><span class=\"hsn-fig__colfill\" data-v=\"60\"><\/span><\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__lab\">Patent 10,025,731<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div><\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case also reaches the larger machines that hold these modules. The notice names servers, computing systems and storage systems as examples<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Parts of these products are included as well. The Commission&#8217;s rules say this plain description in the notice defines the scope of the investigation<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-4\" id=\"hsn-cite-4\">4<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Netlist relies on four U.S. patents<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The notice lists the patent claims, which are the numbered statements of what each patent protects:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>U.S. Patent No. 10,025,731<\/strong>: claims 1-13 and 16-18, or 16 claims<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>U.S. Patent No. 10,217,523<\/strong>: claims 1-15, 17 and 18, or 17 claims<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>U.S. Patent No. 12,373,366<\/strong>: claims 1-14 and 16-28, or 27 claims<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>U.S. Patent No. 12,675,407<\/strong>: claims 1-20, or 20 claims<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That makes 80 patent claims in the case. The Commission will decide whether the imports infringe one or more of them<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Which companies does the Netlist case name?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Commission named six companies as respondents, the companies accused of breaking section 337<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. They are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Micron Technology, Inc.<\/strong>, of Boise, Idaho.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Micron Semiconductor Products, Inc.<\/strong>, of Boise, Idaho.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.<\/strong>, of Spring, Texas.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lenovo Group Ltd.<\/strong>, of Hong Kong.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lenovo (United States) Inc.<\/strong>, of Morrisville, North Carolina.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Super Micro Computer, Inc.<\/strong>, of San Jose, California.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Netlist is the complainant, the company that brought the case<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, a unit of the Commission, is also a party<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. Its lawyer acts as an independent party who represents the public interest<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Buyers of servers and storage systems from these brands may be affected. A limited exclusion order covers products of named companies<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\" id=\"hsn-cite-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>. Here that could include servers that contain the accused memory.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What could happen to DDR5 shipments at the border?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Commission has not yet decided anything on the merits of the case<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. Opening the investigation does not stop any goods today. Shipments of DDR5 memory and servers continue to enter the United States while the case runs.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v3\" data-at=\"what-could-happen-to-ddr5-shipments-at-the-border\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__table\">\n    <h4>The orders the Commission can issue<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n      <thead>\n        <tr><th>Question<\/th><th>Exclusion order<\/th><th>Cease and desist order<\/th><\/tr>\n      <\/thead>\n      <tbody>\n        <tr><th>What it does<\/th><td>Stops the products at the border<\/td><td>Tells companies to stop certain actions<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>Asked for by Netlist<\/th><td>Yes, a limited one<\/td><td>Yes<\/td><\/tr>\n        <tr><th>When it becomes final<\/th><td>60 days after issuance<\/td><td>60 days after issuance<\/td><\/tr>\n      <\/tbody>\n    <\/table><\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the Commission finds a violation, it can use two tools<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>An exclusion order<\/strong>, which tells customs to stop the products at the border. U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the border agency, enforces these orders<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>A cease and desist order<\/strong>, which tells the companies to stop certain actions<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Netlist asks for a limited exclusion order, not a general one<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The Commission&#8217;s rules allow a <strong>general exclusion order<\/strong>, which blocks the goods from every source, only in two cases<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>. One is to stop companies from getting around a limited order. The other is a pattern of violations where the source of infringing goods is hard to identify<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If it issues an order, the Commission also sets a bond, an amount of money the respondent must post<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>. The rules say the bond must be large enough to protect the complainant from any injury<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why will the judge study the US industry and public interest?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Commission ordered the judge in this case to take evidence on the public interest<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. This means the effect that a ban would have on public health and welfare, competition in the U.S. economy, U.S. production of similar goods, and U.S. consumers<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>. The judge must give the Commission findings and a recommendation on these points<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Under the rules, a judge does not normally take evidence on the public interest unless the Commission orders it<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>. Here the Commission did so in the notice. Before acting, the Commission can also ask the Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, customs and other agencies for advice<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-5\">5<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Commission also asked for a full record on the U.S. industry<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The judge may look at how far Netlist&#8217;s claims rely on spending by other companies. The judge may also look at how much of the spending linked to the U.S. products takes place outside the United States<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How does the section 337 case move forward?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Commission&#8217;s news release and its rules set out the path of the case<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The main steps are:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>The Chief Administrative Law Judge names the judge who will run the case<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>Within <strong>45 days after institution<\/strong>, the Commission sets a target date for finishing the investigation<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>The judge holds a formal hearing, where the parties present evidence<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>The judge issues an initial determination on whether section 337 was broken<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>The Commission may review that decision and adopt, change or reverse it<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<li>The Commission makes a final determination and decides on any orders<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If the Commission does not review the judge&#8217;s decision, that decision becomes the Commission&#8217;s final decision<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. Appeals of Commission orders go to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The judge usually issues a protective order soon after the case starts<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>. It controls how the companies&#8217; confidential business data is handled.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What must the six DRAM respondents file?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The six named companies must answer the complaint and the notice. The Commission will consider their answers if they arrive <strong>within 20 days after service<\/strong>, the date the Commission sends them the complaint and notice<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The Commission will extend this deadline only for good cause<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Each answer must be made under oath and respond to every claim in the complaint<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-6\" id=\"hsn-cite-6\">6<\/a><\/sup>. Each answer must include, where available, data on the quantity and value of imports of the accused goods<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-6\">6<\/a><\/sup>. Respondents that are importers must also give the <strong>Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers<\/strong> for their imports<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-6\">6<\/a><\/sup>. These are the customs codes used to classify goods at the U.S. border.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Respondents that do not make the accused goods themselves must name and give the address of their suppliers<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-6\">6<\/a><\/sup>. If possible, each respondent must also send a sample of the accused product with its answer<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-6\">6<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A company that does not answer in time risks losing the case. The Commission may then accept Netlist&#8217;s claims as true and issue an exclusion order, a cease and desist order, or both<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">When could a DDR5 import ban take effect?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No ban date is set yet. The investigation itself began with the Commission&#8217;s order of Sept. 22, 2026, and the notice was issued on Sept. 23, 2026<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-1\">1<\/a><\/sup>. The Commission will set its target date for the end of the case within 45 days of institution<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"hsn-fig hsn-fig--solid hsn-fig--v3\" data-at=\"when-could-a-ddr5-import-ban-take-effect\">\n  <div class=\"hsn-fig__axis\">\n    <h4>The DDR5 case so far<\/h4>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Aug. 11, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Netlist files complaint<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Aug. 25, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Supplement filed<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Sept. 22, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Investigation opened<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n    <div class=\"hsn-fig__ev\">\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evdate\">Sept. 25, 2026<\/span>\n      <span class=\"hsn-fig__evlab\">Federal Register notice<\/span>\n    <\/div>\n  <\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Commission says it will make a final decision &quot;at the earliest practicable time&quot;<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. Any order it then issues takes effect when issued. It becomes final <strong>60 days after issuance<\/strong>, unless the U.S. Trade Representative disapproves it for policy reasons during that period<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-2\">2<\/a><\/sup>. The President gave the Trade Representative this power to veto exclusion orders in 2005<sup class=\"hsn-cite\"><a href=\"#hsn-ref-3\">3<\/a><\/sup>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For importers and buyers of DDR5 servers, nothing changes at the border until the Commission issues an order. After that, the 60-day review period follows.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Key points on the DDR5 memory investigation<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The table sums up the main facts of the case.<\/p>\n<div class=\"hsn-table\">\n<div class=\"pcrstb-wrap\"><table>\n<thead><tr><th>Question<\/th><th>Answer<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr><td>What happened?<\/td><td>Patent investigation opened on imports<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who acted?<\/td><td>U.S. International Trade Commission<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Case number<\/td><td>Investigation No. 337-TA-1523<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Which goods?<\/td><td>DDR5 memory modules, servers, computing and storage systems<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Who complained?<\/td><td>Netlist, Inc. of Irvine, California<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>How many companies named?<\/td><td>Six, from Micron, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Lenovo, Super Micro<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>What is asked for?<\/td><td>Limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Patents in the case<\/td><td>Four U.S. patents, 80 claims<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Investigation opened<\/td><td>Sept. 22, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Federal Register notice<\/td><td>Sept. 25, 2026<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Answer deadline<\/td><td>20 days after service<\/td><\/tr>\n<tr><td>Next date<\/td><td>Target date set within 45 days<\/td><\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The next step is the Commission&#8217;s target date for finishing the case, due within 45 days of institution. Until the Commission issues an order, DDR5 memory modules and the servers that contain them can still enter the United States.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading hsn-refs-title\">Sources<\/h2>\n<ol class=\"hsn-refs\">\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-1\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-1\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 1 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/09\/25\/2026-19697\/certain-dynamic-random-access-memory-dram-devices-products-containing-the-same-and-components\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (III); Notice of Institution of Investigation<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/09\/25\/2026-19697\/certain-dynamic-random-access-memory-dram-devices-products-containing-the-same-and-components<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-2\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-2\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 2 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/press_room\/news_release\/2026\/er0923_69264.htm\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">USITC Institutes Section 337 Investigation of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (III)<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/press_room\/news_release\/2026\/er0923_69264.htm<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-3\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-3\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 3 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/intellectual_property\/documents\/337_faqs.pdf\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">337 Investigations Frequently Asked Questions<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/intellectual_property\/documents\/337_faqs.pdf<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-4\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-4\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 4 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-B\/section-210.10\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">eCFR :: 19 CFR 210.10 &#8212; Institution of investigation.<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-B\/section-210.10<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-5\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-5\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 5 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-G\/section-210.50\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">eCFR :: 19 CFR 210.50 &#8212; Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by respondents.<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-G\/section-210.50<\/span><\/li>\n<li id=\"hsn-ref-6\"><a class=\"hsn-refs__back\" href=\"#hsn-cite-6\" aria-label=\"Back to reference 6 in the text\">\u21a9<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-C\/section-210.13\" rel=\"noopener\" target=\"_blank\">eCFR :: 19 CFR 210.13 &#8212; The response.<\/a> <span class=\"hsn-refs__url\">https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-C\/section-210.13<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>United States International Trade Commission initiated a Section 337 investigation into certain dynamic random access memory devices, products containing\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2145,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_regnews_id":"35574","_hsn_citations":"[{\"n\":1,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2026\/09\/25\/2026-19697\/certain-dynamic-random-access-memory-dram-devices-products-containing-the-same-and-components\",\"label\":\"Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (III); Notice of Institution of Investigation\"},{\"n\":2,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/press_room\/news_release\/2026\/er0923_69264.htm\",\"label\":\"USITC Institutes Section 337 Investigation of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Devices, Products Containing the Same, and Components Thereof (III)\"},{\"n\":3,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.usitc.gov\/intellectual_property\/documents\/337_faqs.pdf\",\"label\":\"337 Investigations Frequently Asked Questions\"},{\"n\":4,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-B\/section-210.10\",\"label\":\"eCFR :: 19 CFR 210.10 -- Institution of investigation.\"},{\"n\":5,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-G\/section-210.50\",\"label\":\"eCFR :: 19 CFR 210.50 -- Commission action, the public interest, and bonding by respondents.\"},{\"n\":6,\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.ecfr.gov\/current\/title-19\/chapter-II\/subchapter-C\/part-210\/subpart-C\/section-210.13\",\"label\":\"eCFR :: 19 CFR 210.13 -- The response.\"}]","_hsn_no_sources":"","_hsn_content_hash":"671426defb0d5bad5efb6a391c1fcb0b44ad20d7:60123f0f3cea86acf062efd5fd112db9c1640a18","_yoast_wpseo_focuskw":"dynamic random access memory (dram) devices","footnotes":""},"categories":[148,8],"tags":[20],"class_list":["post-2147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-americas","category-trade-regulation","tag-united-states-of-america"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2147"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2147\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2403,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2147\/revisions\/2403"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2145"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hscodematch.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}