Uganda has issued new regulatory specifications for multiple cheese types, including Caciotta, Ricotta, Paneer, and Goat cheese, to ensure quality and safety for human consumption and processing
Uganda Sets New Standards for Key Cheese Types
Importers and producers must meet new quality and safety rules for Caciotta, Ricotta, Paneer, and Goat cheese.
What changed
Caciotta cheese specification established under DEAS 1356: 2026 for quality and safety.
Ricotta cheese specification introduced under DEAS 1358: 2026 defining testing standards.
Paneer cheese specification adopted regionally under DEAS 1360: 2026 from Tanzania.
Goat cheese specification adopted regionally under DEAS 1359: 2026 from Kenya.
Who it affects
Cheese importers must ensure products meet the new DEAS specifications for each cheese type.
Domestic producers must follow production, sampling, and testing requirements in the standards.
Food processors using cheese as ingredients must verify compliance with the specifications.
Key dates
Compliance Requirements for Cheese Types in Uganda Under East African Standards
Uganda, as a member of the East African Community (EAC), adheres to the East African Standards (EAS) for cheese products, including Caciotta, Ricotta, Paneer, and Goat cheese. These standards specify requirements for raw materials, composition, hygiene, contaminants, packaging, and labelling to ensure quality and safety for human consumption. Below is a structured compliance overview based on the provided Draft East African Standards (DEAS).
1. Applicable Standards
The following Draft East African Standards (DEAS) govern the specified cheese types in Uganda:
- DEAS 1356:2026: Caciotta cheese1
- DEAS 1358:2026: Ricotta cheese2
- DEAS 1360:2026: Paneer cheese3
- DEAS 1359:2026: Goat cheese4
These standards are developed under the East African Standards Committee (EASC) and are legally binding for compliance in Uganda1.
2. Key Compliance Requirements by Cheese Type
A. Raw Materials and Ingredients
All cheese types must use milk from cows, buffaloes, goats, sheep, or camels (or combinations thereof) that comply with relevant EAC standards1, 2, 3, 4. Additional requirements:
| Cheese Type | Raw Material Requirements | Essential Ingredients | Optional Ingredients |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caciotta | Milk from permitted animals1 | Starter cultures, rennet/coagulating enzymes, acidulants1 | Spices (flavoured variants), salt (EAS 35)1 |
| Ricotta | Whey or milk/whey mixtures2 | Acidulants (e.g., citric acid)2 | Not specified2 |
| Paneer | Milk from permitted animals3 | Acidulants (e.g., lactic acid, citric acid, vinegar)3 | Spices (flavoured variants), salt (EAS 35)3 |
| Goat Cheese | Goat milk (or other permitted milk)4 | Not specified4 | Not specified4 |
B. Compositional Requirements
Each cheese type must meet specific fat, moisture, and acidity thresholds when tested using prescribed methods:
| Cheese Type | Parameter | Requirement | Test Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caciotta | Not specified in sources | Not specified1 | Not specified1 |
| Ricotta | Not specified in sources | Not specified2 | Not specified2 |
| Paneer | Moisture (max) | 60% by mass3 | AOAC 926.083 |
| Milk fat (dry matter basis) | High fat: >60%, Full fat: >45–60%, Medium fat: >25–45%, Low fat: >10–25%, Fat-free: ≤10%3 | ISO 233193 | |
| Titratable acidity (max) | 0.50% as lactic acid3 | ISO/TS 221133 | |
| Goat Cheese | Not specified in sources | Not specified4 | Not specified4 |
C. Contaminants and Hygiene
All cheese types must comply with maximum residue limits (MRLs) for contaminants and adhere to hygiene codes:
| Requirement | Standard | Test Method |
|---|---|---|
| Pesticide residues | Codex Alimentarius MRLs3, 4 | Not specified |
| Veterinary drug residues | Codex Alimentarius MRLs3, 4 | AOAC 962.14 (Beta-lactams)4 |
| Aflatoxin M1 | ≤0.5 μg/kg3 | ISO 145013 |
| Heavy metals (Lead) | ≤0.02 mg/kg3 | AOAC 999.103, 4 |
| Arsenic | Not specified (Goat cheese)4 | AOAC 942.174 |
| Hygiene | Comply with CXC 1 (General Principles for Food Hygiene) and CXC 57 (Milk and Milk Products)1, 2, 3, 4 | ISO 4832, ISO 11290-2, ISO 16649-22 |
Microbiological Limits (Paneer example):
- Limits for coliforms, Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli are specified in Table 3 of DEAS 1360:20263.
D. Packaging and Labelling
| Requirement | Standard | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Packaging | Food-grade materials1, 2, 3, 4 | Must not impart toxic substances, odours, or flavours1, 2, 3, 4 |
| Labelling | EAS 38 (General requirements) + specific additions1, 2, 3 | Mandatory declarations: |
| – Name and category of cheese1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Source of milk (e.g., "goat milk")1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Milk fat content (%, dry matter, or g/serving)1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Country of origin1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Date of manufacture/expiry1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Storage instructions1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Manufacturer/packer details1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Batch/code number1, 2, 3 | ||
| – Net weight (metric units)1, 2, 3 |
E. Sampling and Testing
- Sampling: Must comply with ISO 707 (general guidance) and ISO 8197 (inspection by variables) or ISO 5538 (inspection by attributes)2, 3, 4.
- Test Methods: Referenced standards (e.g., AOAC 926.08 for moisture/fat, ISO 1735 for fat content) must be used1, 2, 3, 4.
3. Summary Answer
Uganda enforces compliance with Draft East African Standards (DEAS) for Caciotta, Ricotta, Paneer, and Goat cheese, which mandate:
- Raw materials from permitted animals (cows, buffaloes, goats, sheep, camels)1, 2, 3, 4.
- Compositional limits (e.g., Paneer: ≤60% moisture, fat categories from >60% to ≤10%)3.
- Contaminant controls (e.g., Aflatoxin M1 ≤0.5 μg/kg, Lead ≤0.02 mg/kg)3, 4.
- Hygiene under CXC 1 and CXC 57, with microbiological limits for pathogens1, 2, 3, 4.
- Packaging in food-grade materials and labelling per EAS 38, including fat content, origin, and expiry dates1, 2, 3.
- Sampling/testing via ISO 707 and referenced methods (e.g., AOAC 999.10 for heavy metals)2, 3, 4.
These standards are harmonized across the EAC to remove trade barriers and ensure consumer safety1. Manufacturers must use the latest versions of the standards, as they are subject to periodic review1, 4.
Sources
- ↩ WTO TBT notification 26-03060 — Rwanda https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2026/TBT/RWA/26_03060_00_e.pdf
- ↩ WTO TBT notification 26-03030 — Rwanda https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2026/TBT/RWA/26_03030_00_e.pdf
- ↩ WTO TBT notification 26-03031 — Rwanda https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2026/TBT/RWA/26_03031_00_e.pdf
- ↩ WTO TBT notification 26-03029 — Rwanda https://members.wto.org/crnattachments/2026/TBT/RWA/26_03029_00_e.pdf
